Differences in Broadcast and Publishing Content Regulation in the US and Japan

Every country has its own commemorate of laws and regulations, depending on how it is applicable to its the great unwashed. It is usually patterned to suit the needs of the lot and the on-going situations that the country is in. So in comparing two different countries, it is assertable to find that one is stricter than the some separate, or has a broader scope than that of the other country. study the mobilize and publication rules in japan and the join States of the States, it is natural to cope with significant differences in the implementation and the content of the regulations themselves, since they argon being employ to two different countries and different deal.Comparatively, the United States of America have stricter rules and regulations when it comes to broadcast and publishing content. Defining these regulations, it pertains to the intervention of the state in issues regarding economic, social or cultural life according to the standards being set in the country. These issues may be induced by political figures, religious intervention, or by the movement of the people regarding a certain concern. This is usually done to work the circulation of certain issues which authorities deem to be offensive content or that it is destructive in nature.When it comes to broadcast, the most basic form of regulation is through acquiring a license to be able to broadcast. This serves as permission, as well as a contract that the broadcaster should abide by the rules and regulations set for the country. With this, they ar able to broadcast for a certain end of time they are allowed to do so, and that they are liable to follow the regulations strictly, unless they need to be penalized for non interest the guidelines in the country. Japans dissipate Regulations Rules are not that extensive as that of the United States.They have no clear regulation on the content of the broadcast, rather has concentrated much on the technicalities of broadcasting i tself. It doesnt regulate idiot box shows on its contents as long as it doesnt violate the rules of broadcast it has put down. The content of their shows would then depend on the demand of its audiences rather than following a tailored broadcast format. Having the United States in the tighter end, in that respect has been several(prenominal)(prenominal) issue concerning whether them being so strict that it hinders the peoples independence of the press.Media practitioners said that the basis of these intense broadcast regulations is the assumption that wireless and video recording channels are a scarce resource which needs to be managed and regulated, so that the people will receive the right substance of development that they need (McDowell, 1983). What these media practitioners stress is that we are in a world where there are unlimited sources of information available today. Information is packaged in different forms and can be accessed by anyone.This information are not ra dio and television set-broadcast limited, since they can be accessed through the internet, through Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, High exposition Radio models, smart antennas and more. Broadcast is not that scarce, considering that you could access them through a number of choices. In the United States, it is besides difficult to acquire a license, which is done in order to censor broadcasting. But because of the abundance of other sources of information, broadcasting through television or radio is gaining lesser and lesser attention from the audience (Bowie, 2007).This is because the broadcast format in the radio and television is so audience- item and that what they show the people are limited in context. Because of that, people are moving to other squiffys of acquiring information. On the other hand, Japan offers regulations which are less strict, compared to that of the United States. They are more into what the viewing audience want, since they are competing with various information source s which are abundant in Japan. being a country rich in technology, radio or television is just another option for the people to get information (BookMice.net, 2000). Everyone has a mobile device with them which can access the internet anytime, anywhere in the country. With that, imposing strict rules would mean losing market for both the television and radio broadcast media. Japan has a public broadcasting station, which is the NHK. This public broadcasting station is not influenced by the government or any buck private organizations that would social welfare from it. It is kept alive by the Japanese people themselves, wherein it has want independence from the government by having a Receiving Fee System.This is where people open for the station so that it will be kept running without kick upstairs influences from prominent people and well-known organizations. This is to keep the interests of the people, for the people alone, and not by an individual or group wishing to moolah from it. The viewers themselves are required to pay not only to view a specific program in the station but for the whole station as well, so that the NHK is assured to continue its existence. Every household in Japan who owns a TV set is required to pay an equal amount in for the NHK to continue its services.But this assures of an unbiased source of information for the people, wherein they wouldnt get to from censorship imposed by the government or anyone who would want to profit with the information being delivered by the station (Kogawa, 1988). There are also other commercial broadcasters aside from the public broadcasting network, and these commercial networks benefit from advertisements. On the other hand, NHK are not allowed to have any commercials. make content in the United States is also regulated. There are several known fictional childrens stories which have been censored upon entering the shores of the United States.One good example is the Little Red Riding Hood, wherei n it has been censored and edit because the original version shows Little Red Riding Hood carry wine to give to her sick grandmother (CyberCollege. com, 1996). The latest manifestation of censorship in books and publications was in the Harry Potter series. The novel has been the subject of censorship and criticisms since it promotes witchcraft for kids. This, despite the fact that the series has invited a lot of kids to drink down reading books again, not just relying on television and computers as a source of recreation.On the other hand, Japan is more on the open-minded side, wherein publishers are can put in publications mainly anything they can, unless they violate the laws and regulations that have been set for them. There are several forms of publication in Japan wherein it gives people a lot of choices. They are free to publish and it depends on the people whether they would buy it or not, since it is indicated if the content is not for minor, or that it has graphic situat ions not for the young audience.When looking up-close at these two countries, we could see that the United States of America have stricter rules and regulations when it comes to publication and broadcasting. This is because of the difference in their audiences and their cultural background. Japan is more open when it comes to informing the people, since it has abundance in technology. But this doesnt mean that both countries dont consider their audiences when they put these regulations and restrictions. Because of the difference in their audience, their approaches are also different, thus resulting to various rules and regulations being established.